For Infrastructure & Operations Professionals

File Storage Costs Less In The Cloud Than In-House

We Calculate A 74% Cost Reduction, But It's Hard To Compare Apples To Apples

    Why Read This Report

    There's a great deal of hype surrounding cloud delivery models of all flavors, with the assumption that it will usher in a new era of cheaper, better IT. But most I&O organizations struggle to compare the capital, operational, and staffing cost differences between internal and cloud storage. This document will break down the cost differences by modeling a common workload — file storage — built and deployed traditionally versus consumed through the public cloud. Our models reveal a significant cost difference, with the cloud-based model coming in 74% less expensive than I&O running it in-house. However, we encourage I&O leaders to use this document and the associated "Cost Analysis Tool: Cloud Versus Internal File Storage" Excel workbook as a tool and methodology for comparison. Customize the tool with numbers from your own environment and make a better decision as to whether cloud file storage makes sense in your business technology environment.
    US $ 499
    Become A Client

    Get objective, pragmatic guidance that helps you make tough decisions and succeed in a complex world. Contact us to learn more.

    Already A Client?
    Log in to read this document.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    • Cloud Storage Is Workload-Specific
    • Quick Storage Comparisons Don't Measure Storage Costs Effectively
    • An Accurate Comparison Requires A More Detailed Model
    • RECOMMENDATIONS

      Cloud Storage Offerings Are Still Developing: Use Caution
    • Related Research Documents