 |
Forrester evaluated the secure Web sites of the seven largest Canadian banks using our Competitive Site Assessment (CSA) methodology. The analysis used 24 criteria to grade the online banking and bill pay areas of the Web sites. The highest-ranking bank site, TD Canada Trust, scored 74 out of a possible 100 points on our assessment. TD Canada Trust also came out on top in our evaluation of the public portion of Canadian banks' Web sites.
IT spending in the insurance industry will increase by more than 6% this year. Insurers are spending on updating processes and systems, institutionalizing compliance, and selectively outsourcing back-office applications. Underpinning these changes is a significant move to service-oriented architecture (SOA).
Take a look at these recent research reports:
We've recently evaluated these technologies and services using The Forrester Wave:
Click here to see all of the Forrester Waves.
As banks refocus on improving their branches, they should eschew traditional renovation efforts in favor of what Forrester calls a process-centric makeover: a method that focuses on key processes in the branch that cut across products and channels. Some key processes to start with include account opening, lead and referral management, problem resolution, teller queue management, and branch merchandising.
|
 |
 |
Don't Miss Forrester's Finance Forum 2006
Forrester's upcoming Finance Forum 2006, titled "What's Next: The New Realities In Retail Financial Services," on May 22 and 23 at the Grand Hyatt in New York should be an exciting event. We've assembled a great combination of industry speakers and Forrester analysts to help you prepare for significant changes coming in the industry. We hope you'll join us in New York!
Assets And Self-Direction Drive Investor Segmentation
Our research shows that firms can understand and influence investors' channel behavior and choice of providers by segmenting consumers based on two dimensions: assets and self-directedness.
|
The nine resulting segments vary widely in size: The two largest segments, Mainstream Validators and Mass-Affluent Validators, comprise nearly half of all investors. But the nine segments line up very well with a number of characteristics, including income, education, and trading frequency. This segmentation also reliably predicts online spending, broadband access, visits to financial services Web sites, and online trading.
We also divided the customer bases of large investment firms into these nine segments -- to see where firms have particular success. We found that:
-
Direct brokerages dominate the Soloist segments. TD Waterhouse had the highest concentration of Affluent Soloists, which is good news for acquirer Ameritrade.
-
Full-service brokerages dominate the Delegator segments. UBS has a high concentration of Affluent and Mass-Affluent Delegators. Ameriprise has the highest proportion of Mass-Affluent Delegators. And Edward Jones has proportionally more Mainstream Delegators than any other firm.
-
The Validator segments are spread all over. Full-service firm UBS and direct firm TD Waterhouse have the highest concentration of Affluent Validators, but other firms are close behind. ETRADE is just ahead of full-service brokerage Morgan Stanley with Mass-Affluent Validators. And among Mainstream Validators, Fidelity leads the pack -- slightly ahead of a broad mix of firms.
From the nine distinct segments in our new investor segmentation, one particularly attractive target emerges: Mass-Affluent Validators. What makes this group so attractive? One in five of today's investors is a Mass-Affluent Validator. They have sizable investable assets, and no brokerage firm has captured a disproportionate share of these investors. And with an average age of 51, they still have a number of earning years ahead of them.
Traditional brokerages are not equipped to serve the Mass-Affluent Validators. Discount firms like Ameritrade that have done without branches or advice can't provide the required level of human advice. And full-service firms like Smith Barney can't make enough money when a high-price advisor services a $250,000 portfolio. Both types of firms will need to flex their business models to accommodate Mass-Affluent Validators.
Let Us Know If We Can Help
Here are some areas in which we've helped financial services firms:
-
Customer experience reviews. We can evaluate the usability of your Web sites, emails, and phone apps.
-
Web site assessments. We can compare the features on your site with those of your competitors' sites.
-
Market research. We can provide insights on consumers from our existing North American Consumer Technology Adoption Study data or through customized research.
-
Online activity benchmarking. Compare your firm's online efforts with that of other banks and credit unions. We are also kicking off a multiclient research project on organizational models and staffing levels.
Don't forget to reserve your spot at Forrester's Finance Forum 2006: "What's Next: The New Realities In Retail Financial Services" on May 22 and 23 at the Grand Hyatt in New York.
Best regards,
Bruce D. Temkin
Vice President & Practice Director
Financial Services
P.S. Drop me a line at brucetemkin@forrester.com if you have any comments.
EMAIL: Email this issue to a colleague.
PRINT: View a printer-friendly version of this issue.
VIEW ARCHIVE: View past issues of First Look.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT: Call the Client Resource Center 1 866/FORRESTER (1 866/367-7378) or +1 617/613-5730.
EMAIL SUBSCRIPTIONS: If you'd like to subscribe or unsubscribe to First Look, please go to your Email Subscriptions page.
|
|
 |


Entire contents © 1997-2006, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights
reserved. Forrester, Forrester Wave, Forrester's Ultimate Consumer Panel,
WholeView 2, Technographics, TechRankings, and Total Economic Impact are
trademarks of Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the
property of their respective companies. Forrester clients may make one
attributed copy or slide of each figure contained herein. Additional
reproduction is strictly prohibited. For additional reproduction rights and
usage information, go to www.forrester.com. Information is based on best
available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject
to change.
Forrester Research, Inc., 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA 02139
|