|
(Length: 15 pages)
December 22, 2004 Quality Assurance Versus Quality ControlMaking The Right Choice For Your Organizationby Margo Visitacion with Liz Barnett, Kimberly Q. Dowling Executive Summary (This is a document excerpt)Investing in quality is imperative. With more than half of all software projects considered failed or challenged and with support costs for defective software running as high as 50% of the total development cost, companies must invest in quality, even if they don't have the resources or the culture for a full quality assurance (QA) initiative. Although having formal QA may reduce ongoing support and maintenance costs for software projects by up to 50%, many companies shy away from it altogether because implementing QA requires more formality and maturity than they currently possess. For these companies, starting with quality control (QC) practices provides short-term value by inserting quality into the software development process. By focusing on high-value areas like creating standard test procedures and reporting, companies can improve their production quality and reduce customer-reported defects while building the foundations for a more formal QA practice later. Buy Risk-FreeDownload and print PDF immediately. Price: US $499 Our Money-Back Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied, return it for a full refund within three weeks of your online purchase. Already a Forrester Client?
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||