For Sourcing & Vendor Management Professionals (Length: 18 pages)

April 30, 2007

Shattering The Offshore Captive Center Myth

More Than 60% Of Captive Centers Struggle With Escalating Attrition And Costs

This is the first document in the "Offshore Captive Centers" series.

by Sudin Apte

with John C. McCarthy, Christine Ferrusi Ross, Francesca Bartolomey, Allison Thresher

Executive Summary (This is a document excerpt)

The trend of establishing a firm's own facility — known as a "captive center" — in locations like India, China, or Russia continues to find converts. During the past two years, more than 300 North American and European companies started their own offshore setup to lower the costs of product development or back-office operations. However, the majority of the reasons firms cite for building their own facility versus outsourcing to a third party are flawed. Our research shows that in the majority of cases, it is driven by personal reasons such as an expatriate employee's urge to go back to India for family reasons. As a result of the lack of management support, spiraling costs, skyrocketing attrition, and a lack of integration, more than 60% of the captive centers in India alone are struggling. Based on how they score on Forrester's 10-question captive center self-test, firms have four captive exit options ranging from simply shutting down and going home to selling out to a third party.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES & RESOURCES

itemThe Number Of Captive Centers Is On The Rise

itemReasons For Taking A Solo Captive Approach Focus On Control And Costs

itemThe Captive Center Reality Differs Sharply From Many Firms' Perception

itemCaptive Turnaround Strategy Scenarios

itemAssessing The Health Of Your Captive Operation And Your Best Strategy

itemYour Self-Test Score Determines Your Captive Strategy And Exit Options

What it means

itemFailed Captive Centers Will Raise Questions In The Near Term

Forrester interviewed more than 40 provider and user companies, including: Aztecsoft, BEA Systems, Bosch, Business Objects, Cisco Systems, EMC, EPAM Systems, HCL Technologies, HSBC, Infosys Technologies, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, Motorola, Ness Technologies, Persistent Systems, Symphony Services, Tata Consultancy Services, Texas Instruments, and Wipro.

Related Research Documents

itemThe Stages In Taking Product Development Offshore

December 27, 2006, Trends

itemOffshore Product Development Has Arrived

August 3, 2006, Market Overview

Find Documents In Related Categories

This document falls under the following categories. Click on a link below to find similar documents.
Analyst: Sudin Apte
Technology: IT Management, IT Services, IT Strategy, Planning, & Governance, Outsourcing, Sourcing & Procurement, Sourcing Strategy & Execution, Systems Integration
Industry: Corporate Strategy, High-Tech
Geography: Asia Pacific, Europe, North America

Buy Risk Free
Download and print PDF immediately
Price: US $279.00

Add to Cart

Our Money-Back Guarantee
If you are not completely satisfied, return it for a full refund within three weeks of your online purchase.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.

Archived Teleconference:
Surviving The Offshore Vendor Polarization Puzzle
Original air date: Thursday, August 07, 2008
corner border corner
Ratings and Comments
Rating: 8 out of 10
based on 16 ratings across all roles.
corner border corner