August 6, 2009
Best Practices In Organizing For eBusiness
Centralized Teams Lead As Best Practices
by Carrie Johnson, Elizabeth Davis
with Kate van Geldern
Executive Summary (This is a document excerpt)
In the face of the global economic downturn, eBusiness leaders face heightened scrutiny as firms place increased emphasis on the Web as a driver of sales and growth for their companies. eBusiness leaders, under pressure to perform, look to optimize their organizations for success. Through our periodic surveys and years' worth of conversations with eBusiness and channel strategy professionals, we've compiled dozens of eBusiness organizational charts. We've used this information to identify the pros and cons of centralized and decentralized organizations, along with five examples of organizations that have made their structure work best for them.
Buy Risk-Free
Download and print PDF immediately. Price: US $499
Our Money-Back Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied, return it for a full refund within three weeks of your online purchase.
Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
NOTES & RESOURCES |
|---|---|
recommendations
| For this research, we interviewed eBusiness veterans from across a spectrum of industries to get an understanding of how their eBusiness teams are structured, where they report, and what works and doesn't work as a result. In addition to the interviews, we leveraged published and ongoing research about eBusiness teams and specific online channel organizational challenges to determine best-practice structures and the pros and cons of various organizational models. Related Research Documents
April 15, 2009
November 19, 2008
August 21, 2008 |
eBusiness Leaders Constantly Evaluate Their Organizational Structure 
Regardless Of Structure, All eBusiness Leaders See Room For Improvement Find Documents In Related CategoriesThis document falls under the following categories. Click on a link below to find similar documents.
|
||||||||||
Original air date: Wednesday, March 18, 2009
 |
 |
 |
Ratings and Comments
Rating:
  out of 10based on 1 ratings across all roles. |
||
 |
 |
 |
