Document Controls

  • View a Print Friendly version of this document

    Print
  • Toggle highlighting of search terms in this document

  • Text Size: 

    • A (normal)
    • A (larger)
    • A (largest)

For Application Development & Delivery Professionals

Primary Analyst Photo Document Information Rate this Document

August 24, 2009

Application Life Cycles And Fates: Differentiate Between Strategic Intent And Tactical Necessities

by Phil Murphy

with Mike Gilpin, David D'Silva

Average:
10 
(2 ratings)

This is an excerpt

Executive Summary

The application portfolios of large IT organizations are coming under increasing scrutiny as tempting targets for streamlining to increase agility and reduce waste. Applications professionals often seek to assign a label to each application that indicates its medium- to long-term long fate. Forrester has defined "four fates" organizations can assign to an application: leave it as is, modernize it, replace it, and retire it. It's important that, when considering the fates, applications professionals view them as indicators of longer-term strategic intent and avoid confusing them with the day-to-day tactics that may seem out of step with an application's particular fate.

Keywords

This is an excerpt

Buy Risk-Free

Price: US $499

Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.

Add to cart

Save and Share

Document Tools

Spread the word:

ALSO OF INTEREST