Document Controls

  • View a Print Friendly version of this document

    Print
  • Toggle highlighting of search terms in this document

  • Text Size: 

    • A (normal)
    • A (larger)
    • A (largest)

For Customer Experience Professionals

Primary Analyst Photo Document Information Rate this Document

May 27, 2009

Best And Worst Of Email Interaction Design, 2009

Forrester Applies Its Email Interaction Review Methodology To 16 Major Firms

by Adele Sage

with Bruce D. Temkin, Andrew McInnes, Rachel Zinser

This is an excerpt

Executive Summary

Forrester applied its Email Interaction Review to the email interactions of 16 firms: four each of the largest auto insurers, discount retailers, footwear manufacturers, and online travel agencies. Only one of the 15 companies that actually responded to our emails passed the evaluation: Nike. As a group, footwear manufacturers outperformed other industries, while discount retailers fell to the bottom of the list. We also found a number of best practices, such as Orbitz's in-context link to the privacy policy, Target's proactive explanation of potentially confusing terms, and Expedia's clear instructions for how to respond. To improve email interactions, firms should evaluate their own email experiences.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • Examining The Current State Of Email Interaction Experiences
  • Only One Of The 16 Firms Passed Our Email Usability Test
  • Email Interactions Had Flaws In Every Category
  • Best Practices Exist Among The Flaws

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Improve Your Firm's Email Interaction Experiences
  • Supplemental Material
  • Related Research Documents

This is an excerpt

Buy Risk-Free

Price: US $499

Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.

Add to cart

Save and Share

Document Tools

Spread the word: