For Vendor Strategy Professionals

Primary Analyst Photo	Document Information	Rate this Document
	April 22, 2009 Forrester's Partner-Type Taxonomy: Lingua Franca For A New Era Simplifying The Partner Dance Card So Everybody Is On The Same Page by Peter O'Neill with R "Ray" Wang, Stefan Ried, Ph.D., Tim Harmon, Charles Green	Average: 9  (2 ratings)

This is an excerpt

Executive Summary

Compared with other industries, outsiders perceive information technology (IT) to be relatively young — influenced in its youthfulness more by technology than business trends and driven by technology experts with only occasional business-savvy. The partnerships that IT vendors develop and communicate to the market also reflect this bias for technology considerations versus business principles. The partnership monikers reflect inconsistent usage and even abuse of terminology, so buyers often find themselves confused by the morass of definitions. As the industry evolves toward maturity, the IT ecosystem of supply chain and channel partners will become less dynamic. Subsequently, vendor strategy professionals who manage partner programs should seek the opportunity to push for an industry-standard taxonomy when communicating partnerships and partner portfolios to buyers and other vendors. Forrester has developed such partnership taxonomy and recommends that vendors have more sympathy for their audience by simplifying the plethora of partner titles currently being used.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

• The "Partner" Moniker Means Too Many Things To Too Many People
• An Evolving Partner Market Demands A New Taxonomy
• Forrester's Partner-Type Taxonomy Provides Clarity

RECOMMENDATIONS

• Make Partner Taxonomy Clearer By Keeping It Simple
• Related Research Documents

This is an excerpt

Buy Risk-Free

Price: US $2495

Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.