Document Controls

  • View a Print Friendly version of this document

    Print
  • Toggle highlighting of search terms in this document

  • Text Size: 

    • A (normal)
    • A (larger)
    • A (largest)

For Application Development Professionals

Primary Analyst Photo Document Information Rate this Document
This is a Client Choice document

April 7, 2006

How Insurers Should Pick Business Rules Engines

by Marc Cecere

with John R. Rymer, Bruce D. Temkin, Adele Sage

Average:
(1 rating)

This is an excerpt

Executive Summary

Insurance firms are increasingly interested in automating business processes. To make this move, they'll need to choose between embedded and independent rules engines. The embedded engines that are included with applications like policy administration and claims processing are tightly integrated with these applications, cost less, and provide simpler development environments. Independent rules platforms, on the other hand, cost more, provide richer development tools, and are rapidly adding insurance-specific capabilities. During the next three years, we expect several of the independent platforms to match the ease of use and integration capabilities of the embedded engines. As a result, insurers should bias their near-term decision toward an embedded rules engine but make plans to move gradually toward enterprisewide deployment of independent platforms.

This is an excerpt

Buy Risk-Free

Price: US $499

Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.

Add to cart

Save and Share

Document Tools

Spread the word: