Forrester: - Making Leaders Successful Every Day |
Search Forrester.com |
|||||||||||
Global Navigation
Local Navigation |
||||||||||||
| Primary Analyst Photo | Document Information | Rate this Document |
|---|---|---|
![]() |
February 10, 2010 Q&A: To zIIP Or Not — System Z's Dark Horse?The What, When, And Why Of IBM's Misunderstood Specialty Processorby Brad Day with Simon Yates, Lauren E Nelson |
|
This is an excerpt
The No. 1 priority of System z users in 2009 was to improve the life-cycle cost of ownership of their mainframe footprints. And while some of this endgame would occur in just hardball negotiation cycles — with mainframe customers taking different negotiation approaches through a variety of different pricing mechanisms and conventions — one of the ongoing opportunities in driving toward a lower life-cycle cost for the System z footprint has started with turning on more specialty processors. Both the Integrated Facility for Linux (IFL) and the System z Application Assist Processor (zAAP) have garnered a significant amount of deployment traction to run new workloads on zLinux as well as to offload any form of Java processing, respectively. However, the most powerful — yet often misunderstood — specialty processor is the System z Integrated Information Processor (zIIP), in particular for customers who require potential software cost reductions across both legacy and modernized software stacks targeted at the System z mainframe.
This is an excerpt
Price: US $499
Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.
Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.
Sourcing & Procurement, Sourcing Strategy & Execution, IT Infrastructure & Operations, Computer Architectures, Server Hardware