Document Controls

  • View a Print Friendly version of this document

    Print
  • Toggle highlighting of search terms in this document

  • Text Size: 

    • A (normal)
    • A (larger)
    • A (largest)

For Application Development & Delivery Professionals

Primary Analyst Photo Document Information Rate this Document

September 13, 2004

SOAP Versus REST: A Comparison

The Key Tradeoff Is Simplicity Versus Quality Of Service

by Randy Heffner

with Mike Gilpin

Average:
(1 rating)

This is an excerpt

Executive Summary

While the major vendors and standards bodies continue to build the core Web services stack around SOAP, a small and sometimes vocal minority eschews SOAP in favor of Web services based on Representational State Transfer (REST). While there is some truth in proponents' claims that REST is simpler and faster, they tend to ignore issues of quality of service (QoS), which are the primary driver of the growing complexity of the SOAP-based Web services stack. Oddly enough, today's REST versus SOAP debate sounds almost the same as the SOAP versus CORBA debates from four years ago. REST has a place as a transition step to Web services, and it may even garner a long-term place for simple create-read-update-delete types of interactions, but tooling and infrastructure for SOAP provide greater productivity, making it a more strategic investment for a wider range of long-term requirements.

This is an excerpt

Buy Risk-Free

Price: US $199

Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.

Add to cart

Save and Share

Document Tools

Spread the word: