Advanced Search

Save Or Share This Report

For Customer Experience Professionals

Best And Worst Of Email Interaction Design, 2007

Forrester Applies Its Email Interaction Review Methodology To 16 Major Firms

April 23, 2007

Primary author headshot

Authors

  • By Moira Dorsey
  • with Adele Budovsky,
  • Bruce D. Temkin,
  • Vidya L. Drego,
  • Ross Popoff-Walker,
  • Steven Geller

Why Read This Report

Forrester applied its Email Interaction Review methodology to the email experiences at 16 firms — four of the largest credit card issuers, consumer electronics retailers, PC manufacturers, and wireless providers. Of the nine companies that actually responded to our emails, none passed, but Circuit City received the highest overall score. Despite the many problems that we found with these email interactions, we also found a number of good practices like Wal-Mart's email headers, Dell's email reply process, and Gateway's placement of privacy policies. To improve email experiences, firms should follow a user-centric approach to designing email interactions.

Get Access

Already a Client?

Log in to read this document.

Become a Forrester Client

Timely and relevant, Forrester's RoleView research aligns to 13 leadership roles across business and technology management. Our expertise in customer experience, mobile, digital business, and big data will help your teams win in the age of the customer. Contact us to learn more.

Purchase Report

This report is available for individual purchase ($499 USD).

Purchase

Also in Collection: Best And Worst Of Experience Design, 2007

Table of Contents

  • Examining The Current State Of Email Interaction Experiences
  • Email Customer Service Fails The Test: None Of The 16 Firms Passed
  • Flaws In Every Category
  • Email Interaction Best Practices Among The Flaws
  • RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Improve The Email Channel
  • Supplemental Material
  • Related Research Documents

Recommended Research