Trend Report

Cost Comparison Of iSCSI Versus Fibre Channel SAN Components

Favorable Economics Makes iSCSI Worthy Of Serious Consideration

Andrew Reichman
 and  two contributors
Feb 07, 2008

Summary

Although a great deal of energy is expended discussing the performance differences of IP-based and Fibre Channel (FC)-based storage area networks (SAN), it is generally accepted that it is cheaper to deploy an iSCSI SAN. This report dissects the components of an IP-based SAN and compares the up-front and ongoing costs versus a FC SAN. The cost advantage of iSCSI is so significant in terms of server side and switch network costs that you owe it to your budget to determine which applications would be a good fit for this technology. Some implementations of IP-based storage networking can struggle with high intensity application workloads, others have matured significantly and are more capable of handling enterprise-class applications. Given the hardware acquisition cost benefits as well as synergies in network staff and infrastructure, significant benefits can be gained from the use of iSCSI-based SAN architectures.

Log in to continue reading
Client log in
Welcome back. Log in to your account to continue reading this research.
Become a client
Become a client today for these benefits:
  • Stay ahead of changing market and customer dynamics with the latest insights.
  • Partner with expert analysts to make progress on your top initiatives.
  • Get answers from trusted research using Izola, Forrester's genAI tool.
Purchase this report
This report is available for individual purchase ($1495).