Case Study: Learning The Difference Between Good And Bad Governance
How A European Bank Deployed BPM Governance To Support The Renewal Of Its Core Banking System
December 22, 2011
Why Read This Report
Business executives at a European universal bank learned valuable lessons from its experiences implementing both good and bad operational governance during the renewal of its core banking processes and platforms. The bank first attempted to govern change processes from within an IT shared services organization — and failed. With the second attempt, it invested in the development of a business process management (BPM) unit and gave that unit a mandate to govern and manage the renewal process at all levels of the organization. The BPM governance approach worked better than the IT-driven one, as it provided the foundational elements required for such change programs to succeed: 1) a clear process strategy to focus the organization on what it needs to accomplish; 2) a BPM function to be accountable and responsible for driving change; and 3) a self-regulated performance management system to keep all stakeholders focused on business outcomes.
Already a Client?
Log in to read this document.
Become a Forrester Client
Customers are the new market-makers, reshaping industries and changing how businesses compete and win. Success depends on how well and how fast you respond. Forrester Research gives you insights and frameworks aligned to your role to shorten the time between a great idea and a great outcome, helping your teams win in the age of the customer. Contact us to learn more.
This report is available for individual purchase ($499 USD).Purchase