Trends Report

Cost Comparison Of iSCSI Versus Fibre Channel SAN Components

Favorable Economics Makes iSCSI Worthy Of Serious Consideration

February 7th, 2008
Andrew Reichman, null
Andrew Reichman
With contributors:
Simon Yates , Rachel A. Dines

Summary

Although a great deal of energy is expended discussing the performance differences of IP-based and Fibre Channel (FC)-based storage area networks (SAN), it is generally accepted that it is cheaper to deploy an iSCSI SAN. This report dissects the components of an IP-based SAN and compares the up-front and ongoing costs versus a FC SAN. The cost advantage of iSCSI is so significant in terms of server side and switch network costs that you owe it to your budget to determine which applications would be a good fit for this technology. Some implementations of IP-based storage networking can struggle with high intensity application workloads, others have matured significantly and are more capable of handling enterprise-class applications. Given the hardware acquisition cost benefits as well as synergies in network staff and infrastructure, significant benefits can be gained from the use of iSCSI-based SAN architectures.

Want to read the full report?

Contact us to become a client

This report is available for individual purchase ($1495).

Forrester helps business and technology leaders use customer obsession to accelerate growth. That means empowering you to put the customer at the center of everything you do: your leadership strategy, and operations. Becoming a customer-obsessed organization requires change — it requires being bold. We give business and technology leaders the confidence to put bold into action, shaping and guiding how to navigate today's unprecedented change in order to succeed.