Save or Share this Report

For Application Development & Delivery Professionals

Use Action-Oriented Categories To Guide Application Life-Cycle Investment Decisions

Human Life-Cycle Analogies Provide No Value And Introduce Bias

October 17, 2008

Primary author headshot


  • By Phil Murphy
  • with Alex Cullen,
  • ,
  • Tim DeGennaro

Why Read This Report

Excessive IT costs have application development and program management professionals searching for ways to reduce wasteful spending within their application portfolios. Many organizations begin the process by describing applications using human terms such as "adolescent" and "elderly," but that is a diversion with no practical benefit. Forrester's four fates, scoring perspectives, and application management continuum provide a more robust management framework.

Get Access

Already a Client?

Log in to read this document.

Become a Forrester Client

Customers are the new market-makers, reshaping industries and changing how businesses compete and win. Success depends on how well and how fast you respond. Forrester Research gives you insights and frameworks aligned to your role to shorten the time between a great idea and a great outcome, helping your teams win in the age of the customer. Contact us to learn more.

Purchase Report

This report is available for individual purchase ($499 USD).


Also in Collection: Application Management Continuum Stages

Table of Contents

  • Failure To Manage Life Cycles Creates Problems
  • Human Life-Cycle Analogies Have Several Flaws
  • Use The Four Fates And Scoring Perspectives To Guide Decisions
  • Put Modernization In A Strategic Context

  • Manage Life Cycles With The Four Fates, Scoring, And The Continuum
  • Related Research Documents

Recommended Research