Best Practice Report

Market Researchers Demand High Panel Quality

New Initiatives Can Help With Quality — Particularly With B2B Sample

Brad Bortner
 and  four contributors
Apr 03, 2009

Summary

The rapid embrace of online panels as a primary method of quantitative research in the US and Europe is a Faustian bargain. Online panels enable cheap, fast insights, but the quality of respondents is a concern. This concern is exacerbated for B2B, where the incentives are higher, leading to a potentially greater propensity for identity fraud. Two new technology solutions are fighting it out to be the industry-leading choice to solve this dilemma: Optimus and TrueSample. Currently, many buyers and panel vendors are in heavy evaluation mode to determine which of these they should use, how much improvement they can expect, and whether they should develop their own competing solutions instead. Forrester believes both solutions will be sustained and other proprietary solutions will also come to market as panel vendors weigh the competitive issues involved with integrating them. Forrester urges buyers of research to embrace one of these solutions — or demand their panel suppliers to — even though these solutions are new. The downside of doing nothing is far greater than making a choice and switching horses at a later date.

Log in to continue reading
Client log in
Welcome back. Log in to your account to continue reading this research.
Become a client
Become a client today for these benefits:
  • Stay ahead of changing market and customer dynamics with the latest insights.
  • Partner with expert analysts to make progress on your top initiatives.
  • Get answers from trusted research using Izola, Forrester's genAI tool.
Purchase this report
This report is available for individual purchase ($1495).