Shattering The Offshore Captive Center Myth
More Than 60% Of Captive Centers Struggle With Escalating Attrition And Costs
April 30, 2007
Why Read This Report
The trend of establishing a firm's own facility — known as a "captive center" — in locations like India, China, or Russia continues to find converts. During the past two years, more than 300 North American and European companies started their own offshore setup to lower the costs of product development or back-office operations. However, the majority of the reasons firms cite for building their own facility versus outsourcing to a third party are flawed. Our research shows that in the majority of cases, it is driven by personal reasons such as an expatriate employee's urge to go back to India for family reasons. As a result of the lack of management support, spiraling costs, skyrocketing attrition, and a lack of integration, more than 60% of the captive centers in India alone are struggling. Based on how they score on Forrester's 10-question captive center self-test, firms have four captive exit options ranging from simply shutting down and going home to selling out to a third party.
Already a Client?
Log in to read this document.
Become a Forrester Client
Customers are the new market-makers, reshaping industries and changing how businesses compete and win. Success depends on how well and how fast you respond. Forrester Research gives you insights and frameworks aligned to your role to shorten the time between a great idea and a great outcome, helping your teams win in the age of the customer. Contact us to learn more.
This report is available for individual purchase ($499 USD).Purchase
Table of Contents
- The Number Of Captive Centers Is On The Rise
- The Captive Center Reality Differs Sharply From Many Firms' Perception
- Captive Turnaround Strategy Scenarios
- Assessing The Health Of Your Captive Operation And Your Best Strategy
WHAT IT MEANS
- Failed Captive Centers Will Raise Questions In The Near Term
- Related Research Documents