The digital landscape in ASEAN is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by a potent cocktail of digital sovereignty imperatives and shifting global geopolitics. For years, conventional wisdom in enterprise cloud adoption revolved around multicloud — leveraging several providers for redundancy, cost optimization, and avoiding vendor lock-in, or merely by accident. What we’re now observing in Southeast Asia, however, is a more nuanced and strategically driven “diverse cloud” approach that directly addresses concerns around US foreign policy uncertainty and the imperative for localized data control.

The result? A fascinating trend where local cloud providers, US hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, GCP), and Chinese powerhouses (Alibaba Cloud, Tencent Cloud, Huawei Cloud) are all finding a place in the regional digital ecosystem. This isn’t just about technical merit; it’s about strategic alignment and risk mitigation.

Chinese Cloud Leaders: Strategic “Go Global” Ambitions Starting With APAC

Perhaps one of the most telling indicators of this shift is the renewed vigor of Chinese cloud service providers in the APAC region. On one hand, the economic slowdown in the domestic market and the globalization needs of Chinese firms like PDD and BYD are driving them to accelerate their global operations. On the other hand, they are also rebalancing their regional investments to address ongoing geopolitical frictions. While Alibaba Cloud ceased operations in Australia and India in 2024, all Chinese cloud leaders such as Alibaba Cloud, Tencent Cloud, and Huawei Cloud have renewed their strategic initiatives in APAC with ASEAN nations center stage. Their unique proposition — a hyperscaler with deep roots in a non-Western superpower — resonates strongly with ASEAN countries seeking alternatives and balance. Their investments in new data centers, partnerships with local telcos, and tailored industry solutions underscore this renewed commitment. They are positioning themselves not just as a technology provider but as a strategic partner in achieving digital autonomy.

Country-Specific Strategies: A Patchwork Of Pragmatism

While the overarching theme is diversification, the specific manifestations vary across ASEAN:

    • Indonesia is actively promoting local cloud providers while also engaging with foreign hyperscalers. Its focus is often on data residency and ensuring that critical citizen data remains within Indonesian borders. We’re seeing hybrid models proliferate, with sensitive data hosted locally, while less critical workloads leverage global providers.
    • Vietnam’s “made in Vietnam 2025” initiative extends to digital infrastructure, with a push for domestic technology development, but this approach also sees the Vietnamese welcoming investment from major global players, fostering competition, and ensuring access to cutting-edge cloud services. The strategy often involves requiring foreign providers to partner with local entities or establish significant local presence.
    • Malaysia is actively pursuing a “Cloud First Strategy” policy, with an emphasis on security and data governance. Keen to leverage the benefits of cloud computing while maintaining control over the country’s digital destiny, this translates to a preference for providers that can demonstrate strong security credentials and a willingness to comply with local regulations.
    • Even Singapore, a traditionally more open market, is emphasizing resilience and diversification in its digital infrastructure strategy. While a hub for many global hyperscalers, there’s an increased focus on ensuring redundancy and exploring options that might offer greater control in a fragmented geopolitical landscape.

Beyond Multicloud: The Geopolitical Imperative And The AI Factor

This “diverse cloud” approach is more than just an IT strategy; it’s a geopolitical imperative. ASEAN nations are acutely aware of their unique position in a contested global arena. By diversifying their cloud infrastructure across a range of providers — local, US, and Chinese — they are asserting their digital sovereignty, mitigating risks, and ensuring that their digital future remains firmly in their own hands.

Crucially, we expect this strategic pattern to proliferate in different forms, particularly as the global race for AI supremacy heats up. Consider:

  • The UAE, with its ambitious “National AI Strategy,” is a prime example of a nation looking to build a robust, AI-native digital government. While partnering with US hyperscalers, the UAE is also heavily investing in sovereign cloud capabilities and fostering homegrown AI champions such as G42. This isn’t about shunning global players but rather maintaining sovereignty over the foundational AI infrastructure that will power the UAE’s future.
  • Similarly, the European Union, long a proponent of digital sovereignty through even ill-fated initiatives like Gaia-X, is increasingly recognizing that its ambitious AI Act and strategy require a strong, sovereign cloud foundation. With a significant portion of data still residing on non-EU clouds, there’s a concerted effort to foster European cloud providers and ensure that critical AI workloads and data remain within EU jurisdiction, subject to EU law. Beyond compliance, it’s about strategic autonomy in an AI-driven world, where control over data and infrastructure directly translates to economic competitiveness and national security.

For enterprises operating in these dynamic regions, understanding this nuanced approach is paramount. It’s no longer just about optimizing costs or achieving technical agility. It’s about building a cloud strategy that is resilient not only to technological failures but also to geopolitical tremors, especially as AI permeates every layer of the digital stack. The “diverse cloud” is here to stay, and it’s reshaping the digital landscape of Southeast Asia and beyond in profound ways.